by usezloan | Nov 23, 2021 | News
연준 고위 관리들이 2022년 금리 인상을 시사했습니다.
제임스 불러드 세인트루이스 연준 총재는 중앙은행이 계획보다 빨리 채권 매입을 줄이고 금리를 인상해야 할 수도 있다고 말했습니다. 지난 주 여러 연준 관리들은 중앙은행이 경제의 빠른 회복과 높은 인플레이션의 연장에 따라 2022년 말까지 금리를 인상할 수 있다고 밝혔습니다. 연준 지도부는 팬데믹이 시작된 이후 1차 금리 인상이 2022년 말이나 2023년 초에 이루어질 것인지에 대해 의견이 엇갈렸습니다. 그러나 월스트리트는 연준이 더 빨리 조치를 취할 것이라고 점점 더 생각하게 되었고 연준 고위 관리들도 더 수용적인 것처럼 보입니다. . 리처드 클라리다 연준 부의장은 2022년 말 이전에 금리 인상 기준이 충족될 수 있다는 입장을 되풀이했습니다. 클라리다는 제롬 파월 의장에 가까운 것으로 보입니다. 그의 발언은 인플레이션의 급등으로 인해 연준의 최고 책임자들이 계획보다 더 빨리 금리를 인상하는 데 더 개방적일 수 있다는 신호로 볼 수 있습니다. 물가는 연준이 선호하는 PCE 인플레이션 지표를 사용하여 지난 1년 동안 4.4%, 더 잘 알려진 소비자 물가 지수를 기반으로 5.4% 상승했습니다. 그리고 연준의 평균 목표치인 2%보다 훨씬 높습니다. 클라리다는 노동력 부족과 공급 병목 현상이 완화되면서 인플레이션이 2022년에 약 2.25%로 급격히 둔화될 것이라는 파월의 의견을 고수했습니다. Bullard는 또한 Fed가 테이퍼링 계획을 가속화할 수 있다고 생각한다고 말했습니다. Bullard는 2차 세계 대전 이후 계속되는 공급 병목 현상과 “가장 뜨거운 노동 시장 중 하나”가 2022년까지 높은 인플레이션을 유지할 수 있다고 말했습니다. 그는 실업률이 내년까지 3% 범위로 떨어질 것으로 예측합니다. 지난 주 연준은 이달부터 미국 국채와 모기지 담보부 증권에 대한 대규모 매입을 축소하거나 단계적으로 중단할 것이라고 발표했습니다. 중앙은행은 미국 금리를 낮게 유지하기 위한 노력의 일환으로 한 달에 1200억 달러의 유가증권을 매입해 왔다. 채권 매입이 우리 경제 회복에 도움이 되었지만 일부 연준 비평가들은 이것이 인플레이션 증가에 기여했다고 주장합니다. 미국은 매우 빠르게 회복했고 매우 강력하게 성장하여 경제 전반에 걸쳐 부족 현상이 발생했습니다. 이러한 부족으로 인해 인플레이션이 크게 급증했습니다. Bullard는 2022년 말 이전에 두 번의 금리 인상을 약속했습니다.
by usezloan | Nov 22, 2021 | Financial study
융자지식 251-TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure Rule (TRID)
2.35 TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure Rule (TRID)
Prior to October 3, 2015, borrowers received two cost-related disclosure forms at the time of
application and potentially two more similar forms at the time of closing. The similar forms (called the
Good Faith Estimate and Truth in Lending disclosure) contained overlapping information and were
quite confusing for consumers to understand.
In response to those problems, the Dodd-Frank Act required the Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau to combine a few of the disclosures required by RESPA and TILA in order to make them easier
to understand and to cut back on some of the excessive paperwork.
By integrating some of the disclosure forms and making other related changes, the government is
hoping to make it easier for consumers to understand the terms of their loans.
In December 2013, the CFPB addressed the integration of the RESPA and TILA disclosures by finalizing
what has become known as the “TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure Rule.” The rule contains two
newly integrated disclosure forms and instructions on how to use them. Note that even though these
disclosures are referred to as “TRID” or “TILA/RESPA Integrated Disclosures,” the actual requirements
for providing them to applicants are now contained entirely in Regulation Z.
Specifics regarding the newly integrated forms will be discussed in greater detail over the next few
pages. However, the basics are as follows:
● The Good Faith Estimate and the initial Truth in Lending disclosure form have been combined
into one disclosure form known as the Loan Estimate. This form discloses the cost of the credit
itself, as well as settlement cost information based on the information known at the time of
application.
● The HUD Settlement Statement and the final Truth in Lending disclosure form have been
combined into one disclosure form known as the Closing Disclosure, which discloses actual
cost information at the time of closing/settlement/consummation of the loan.
The contents of the TILA-RESPA Integrated Disclosure Rule (including the requirements pertaining to
the two new disclosure forms) apply in credit transactions involving a wide range of mortgage loans.
As with any rule, however, there are some exceptions. The TRID rule doesn’t apply to the following
types of mortgage loans:
● Home equity lines of credit (HELOCs).
● Reverse mortgages.
● Mortgages for mobile homes not secured by real estate.
● Loans from anyone who funds no more than five loans in a calendar year (typically sellers
assisting in financing properties that they are selling).
38 | P a g e
Loans that are exempt from the TRID requirements will continue to use the GFE, HUD and TIL
disclosure forms.
by usezloan | Nov 22, 2021 | Financial study
융자지식 250-Loan Originator Compensation Rule
2.32 Loan Originator Compensation Rule
In the past, loan originators’ compensation was partially based on the type and terms of the chosen
loan product. The Loan Originator Compensation Rule:
• Prohibits creditors from compensating MLOs based on the loan’s interest rate or other terms
associated with the rate/terms of the loan.
• Additionally, the rule eliminated the form of compensation known as yield-spread premium
(YSP), in which mortgage brokers and originators were able to increase their compensation by
providing the borrower an interest rate higher than that for which they qualified.
• Compensation includes commissions, bonuses, salaries, merchandise, trips and any other
financial incentives.
• The law further prohibits against dual compensation; that is, it restricts an originator from
being paid by either the borrower OR the lender on a given transaction, but not both.
Loan originator organizations must keep a record of payments from a creditor and payments to
individual originators for three (3) years.
2.33 Ability-To-Repay (ATR) Mortgage Rules
As part of the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Bill, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)
implemented the Ability to Repay (ATR)/Qualified Mortgage (QM) rule, which took effect on January
10, 2014.
The rule requires lenders to make a reasonable, good-faith determination before or when a loan is
consummated, that the consumer/borrower has a reasonable ability to repay the loan.
If a borrower can prove in court that a loan did not meet the ATR requirements, then the borrower
can sue for up to three times the amount of finance charges paid, including attorney fees. A borrower
has three years to file a claim.
The ability-to-repay provisions requires creditors to make a “reasonable and good faith
determination” based on verified and documented information that, at the time the loan is
consummated (closed), the consumer has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms,
as well as all applicable taxes, insurance (including mortgage insurance) and assessments.
Coverage of the Rule – The rule applies to all closed-end mortgages secured by residential properties,
with the following exceptions:
● HELOCs
● Timeshares
● Reverse mortgages
● Temporary loans (less than 12 months)
● Construction loans
Factors to Consider When Evaluating ATR – Lenders should consider the following eight (8) factors
when determining whether or not a borrower has the ability to repay a mortgage:
1. Current or reasonably expected income or assets.
2. Current employment status.
3. Borrower’s Credit History.
4. Monthly mortgage payment for this loan. You calculate this using the introductory or
fully-indexed rate, whichever is higher, and monthly, fully amortizing payments that are
substantially equal.
5. Monthly payment on any simultaneous loans secured by the same property.
6. Monthly payments for property taxes and insurance that you require the consumer to
buy, and certain other costs related to the property such as homeowner’s association
fees or ground rent.
7. Other debts, including alimony, and child support obligations.
8. Monthly debt-to-income ratios or residual income that you calculated using the total of
all the mortgage and non-mortgage obligations listed above, as a ratio of gross monthly
income.
2.34 Qualified Mortgage
Lenders are deemed to have complied with ATR requirements if they satisfy the definition of a
Qualified Mortgage (QM). The requirements for a QM are, in general:
● No-doc loans not eligible: So-called no-doc loans where the creditor does not verify income
or assets cannot be qualified mortgages.
● No excess upfront points and fees: Limits points and fees, including those used to
compensate loan originators, such as loan officers and brokers. A loan generally cannot be
considered a qualified mortgage if the points and fees paid by the consumer exceed three
percent (3%) of the total loan amount.
● Cap on how much income can go toward debt: Qualified mortgages generally will be
provided to people who have debt-to-income ratios less than or equal to 43%. This
requirement helps ensure consumers are only getting what they can likely afford.
● Maximum loan term of 30 years.
● Prepayment penalties prohibited: Prepayment penalties are generally prohibited, except for
certain fixed-rate, qualified loans.
● No risky or toxic features: No negative amortization, no balloon payments, no Interest-only
loans.
● For ARMs – Must be underwritten as a fully amortizing loan at the maximum interest rate
that the loan can adjust to in the first five (5) years.
Temporarily, if a loan can be sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or insured/guaranteed by FHA, VA or
USDA, the 43% DTI requirement will be waived.
37 | P a g e
NOTE: Do NOT confuse Qualified Mortgages with Qualified Residential Mortgages (QRMs). The QM
deals with a consumer’s ability to repay. The QRM deals with risk retention and focuses on the
secondary market. In essence, if a mortgage loan fulfills all of the requirements to be a QM, the
institution is presumed to have complied with the ability-to-repay requirements. This is an important
distinction because loans that meet the QM standards protect the lender from potential legal action,
as described above.
by usezloan | Nov 22, 2021 | News
주택 착공은 10월에 0.7% 감소했습니다.
주택 착공은 10월에 0.7% 감소한 152만 연율로 나타났습니다. 시작은 1년 전에 비해 0.4% 증가했습니다. 10월의 하락은 전적으로 단독 주택 건설 때문이었습니다. 다가구 주택 시작은 10월에 증가했습니다. 작년에 단독 주택 착공은 10.6% 감소한 반면 다가구 착공은 36.6% 증가했습니다. 전염병 초기 건설 활동의 초기 붕괴에서 벗어난 이후 주택 착공은 평균 연간 155만 건이었으며 10월 착공은 9월보다 0.7% 낮았지만 대략 그 평균 수준을 유지했습니다. 건설업체는 공급망과 노동력 부족을 둘러싼 지속적인 문제를 계속해서 처리하여 활동의 더 큰 증가를 가로막고 있습니다. 세부 사항을 살펴보면 10월의 모든 하락은 활동이 3.9% 감소한 단독 가구 부문에서 발생했습니다. 반면 다가구 건설은 7.1% 증가했다. 특히, 지난 1년 동안 다가구 창업은 36.6% 증가한 반면 단독 주택 창업은 10.6% 감소했습니다. 일부 사람들이 대도시로 다시 이동하고 퇴거 모라토리엄이 종료됨에 따라 급격한 임대료 상승에 대응하여 개발자들이 단독 주택 건설에서 더 큰 아파트 건물로 일부 자원을 이전하고 있는 것으로 보입니다. Zillow는 신규 세입자의 임대 비용이 작년에 9.2% 증가했다고 추정하고 Apartmentlist는 훨씬 더 빠른 15.8% 증가하여 3.0~4.0% 범위의 일반적인 이익을 쉽게 초과할 것으로 추정합니다. 최근의 분배 효과를 제외하고 주택 건설은 건전합니다. 전체 주택 착공의 12개월 이동 평균을 살펴보면 최근 변동성을 파악하는 데 도움이 됨을 알 수 있습니다. 현재 주거 건설이 2007년 이후 가장 빠른 속도로 진행되고 있음을 알 수 있습니다. 월별 활동 속도는 회복세가 계속됨에 따라 증감할 것이지만 주택 시작은 추세를 보일 것으로 예상합니다 앞으로 몇 년 안에 상승할 것입니다. 빌더는 시작을 기다리는 파이프라인에 수많은 허용된 프로젝트가 있습니다. 실제로 승인되었지만 아직 시작되지 않은 프로젝트의 백로그는 현재 1999년 시리즈가 시작된 이후 가장 높습니다. 한편, 신규 건축 프로젝트에 대한 허가는 10월에 4.0% 증가하여 건축업자가 앞으로 더 많은 수요를 볼 수 있음을 보여줍니다. . 미국은 인구 증가와 폐품(자발적 녹다운, 자연 재해 등)을 기준으로 연간 약 150만 건의 주택 착공이 필요하다는 점을 명심하십시오. 그러나 우리는 2006년 이후 어느 해에도 그렇게 많은 새 주택을 짓지 않았습니다. 파이프라인에 있는 많은 미래 건축 활동과 함께 건축업자들은 주택 재고를 늘리고 소비자 수요를 충족시키려고 하며 더 많은 밀레니얼 세대가 마침내 주택 시장에 진입함에 따라 , 2021년 건설이 올해 150만 유닛 벤치마크를 넘고 2022년에는 더 높아질 가능성이 매우 높아 보입니다.
by usezloan | Nov 19, 2021 | Financial study
융자지식 249-Section 35 Higher-Priced Mortgage Loans (HPMLs)
2.31 Section 35 Higher-Priced Mortgage Loans (HPMLs)
TILA was amended in 2009 to create a new category of loans called “higher-priced mortgage loans,”
sometimes known as “HPMLs” or “Section 35 loans.” These loans, formerly called subprime, are now
called Higher Priced Mortgage Loans (HPML).
HPML Thresholds – A loan is a HPML if:
(a) The APR exceeds the APOR by 1.5% or higher for a firstlien
(b) The APR exceeds the APOR by 3.5% or higher for a subordinatelien
(c) The loan amount at which HOEPA’s points-and-fees test comes into effect has increased to
$21,980, and the HOEPA points-and-fees trigger is $1,099.”
Example – A borrower closed on a first mortgage loan of $120,000 where the APOR was quoted at 4%.
The APR at closing was 5.5%. The following would trigger a HPML designation:
APR Test – ARP 5.5. (Equal to or exceeds the APOR threshold – 4% + 1.5% (1st lien) = 5.5% by 1.5%
reaching the 1.5% HPML trigger threshold for a first lien)
On a HPML, the borrower must escrow (first liens only) for a minimum of five (5) years, and the
lender is prohibited from charging a prepayment penalty if the loan’s interest rate can adjust in the
first four years of the loan term.
Additionally, lenders must verify the borrower’s ability to repay all higher-priced mortgage loans by
looking at the borrower’s income, assets, credit and debt and by calculating a debt-to-income ratio.
2.32 Loan Originator Compensation Rule
In the past, loan originators’ compensation was partially based on the type and terms of the chosen
loan product. The Loan Originator Compensation Rule:
• Prohibits creditors from compensating MLOs based on the loan’s interest rate or other terms
associated with the rate/terms of the loan.
• Additionally, the rule eliminated the form of compensation known as yield-spread premium
(YSP), in which mortgage brokers and originators were able to increase their compensation by
providing the borrower an interest rate higher than that for which they qualified.
• Compensation includes commissions, bonuses, salaries, merchandise, trips and any other
financial incentives.
• The law further prohibits against dual compensation; that is, it restricts an originator from
being paid by either the borrower OR the lender on a given transaction, but not both.
Loan originator organizations must keep a record of payments from a creditor and payments to
individual originators for three (3) years.
Recent Comments